web hit counter

How Heavy Was Henry 8th When He Died


How Heavy Was Henry 8th When He Died

Ah, King Henry VIII. The name alone conjures up images of feasts, powerful pronouncements, and… well, let's be honest, a rather impressive physique. We all know the stories. Six wives. A break from the Catholic Church. A Tudor dynasty. But there's one burning question that often gets lost in the royal drama: just how hefty was His Majesty when he finally shuffled off this mortal coil?

Now, I know what you're thinking. "Who cares? He was a king! He probably had a good few stone on him." And you'd be right, of course. But let's delve a little deeper, shall we? Because the popular narrative paints a picture, and sometimes, that picture needs a bit of a retouch. Forget the stern portraits for a moment. Imagine a man, a king, who loved his food. And let me tell you, in the 16th century, "loving your food" was an Olympic sport.

We're talking about a time before calorie counting. Before the gym. Before the dreaded "dad bod" became a thing (though I suspect Henry would have invented it). Back then, a fuller figure was often a sign of wealth and power. If you were skinny, you were probably starving. So, Henry, being the King, was practically obligated to look… substantial. It was good for his brand, really.

Historians throw around numbers, and they can be a bit dizzying. They talk about weights measured in pounds, sometimes even in 'stone', which, let's face it, is a wonderfully old-fashioned unit of measurement. It’s like saying someone weighed a small dog. Or a rather plump cat.

Most estimates suggest that by the time Henry VIII kicked the bucket in 1547, he was weighing in at a considerable amount. We're talking somewhere in the region of 300 to 350 pounds. Yes, you read that right. Three hundred. To. Three. Hundred. And. Fifty. Pounds.

The Death Of Henry VIII - The End of England's BRUTAL Tudor King - YouTube
The Death Of Henry VIII - The End of England's BRUTAL Tudor King - YouTube

Now, that's not just "a bit extra." That's "carrying a small pony around all day" levels of extra. It's "needing a reinforced throne" substantial. It's "making your courtiers nervous about accidental crushes" significant.

Think about it. He was a man who, in his younger days, was reportedly quite athletic. A keen jouster, a formidable sportsman. But as the years went on, and the royal banquets got more frequent and more lavish, his waistline… well, it expanded. It expanded like a balloon at a child's birthday party, only filled with roasted swan and gallons of ale.

The Exploding Corpse Of Henry VIII - YouTube
The Exploding Corpse Of Henry VIII - YouTube

Imagine trying to get dressed in those days. Those magnificent Tudor outfits, all velvet and ermine, must have required a small team of tailors and a good deal of stretching. And the armour? Oh, the armour. It's a wonder he could even move in it by the end. They had to custom-make it for him, of course. You couldn't just pop down to the medieval equivalent of a department store and pick up a size XXXL suit of plates.

And let's not forget the health implications. We know he suffered from a chronic leg ulcer. We know he had gout. All of these things are exacerbated by carrying a significant amount of extra weight. So, while it might seem humorous to us now, sitting here with our Netflix and our low-fat yogurt, for Henry, it was likely a constant struggle.

How Did Henry VIII Die? The Injury That Costs a Life | History Cooperative
How Did Henry VIII Die? The Injury That Costs a Life | History Cooperative
"He was a man who enjoyed life. And by God, he enjoyed his food."

It's easy to be flippant, but I think there's a certain relatability in acknowledging Henry's… ample proportions. We've all had those moments, haven't we? The festive season arrives, and suddenly our favourite jeans feel a tad snug. The difference is, Henry didn't have a treadmill. He had a royal kitchen that was probably operating 24/7, churning out delicious, calorie-laden treats for his kingly appetite.

Some might argue that focusing on his weight is disrespectful to his legacy. But I'd argue the opposite. It humanizes him. It reminds us that even the most powerful monarchs were, at the end of the day, just people. People with cravings, people who enjoyed a good meal, and people who, as they got older, might have found their waistbands a bit tight.

So, the next time you think of Henry VIII, don't just picture the stern face in the portrait. Imagine a man who, by all accounts, was living his best, albeit rather portly, life. A king who proved that you can break from Rome, have six wives, and still be a champion of hearty eating. And in a world that often stresses about appearances, there's something rather refreshing about that, wouldn't you agree? It’s an unpopular opinion, perhaps, but I’m going to say it: Henry VIII’s formidable size was, in its own way, a testament to a life fully, and very deliciously, lived.

You might also like →